Tuesday, December 15, 2009

NY Appellate Division rules on America's Cup venue and rules

[Source: NY Appellate Division] Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered October 30, 2009, which granted plaintiff Golden Gate Yacht Club's (GGYC) motion for an order declaring invalid Societe Nautique De Geneva's (SNG) selection of Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates (RAK) as the venue for the 33rd America's Cup yacht race, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered November 4, 2009, which, inter alia, ruled that, under the Deed of Gift governing the race, a yacht's "rudders" may not be included in measuring its length on load water-line, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Concerning the October 30, 2009 order, by order filed April 7, 2009 (Golden Gate Yacht Club v Societe Nautique de Geneve, 12 NY3d 248 [2009]), the Court of Appeals reinstated a May 12, 2008 order of Supreme Court which provided, insofar as pertinent, that (1) "the location of the match shall be in Valencia, Spain or any other location selected by SNG [or agreed to by the parties], provided SNG notify GGYC in writing not less than six months in advance of the date set for the first challenge match race of the location it has selected for the challenge match races," and (2) that the date of the first race "shall be the date ten calendar months from the date of service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry, upon the attorneys who have appeared herein," or such other date as might be agreed to by the parties (2008 NY Slip Op 32296[U], *4-5 [May 12, 2008, Cahn, J.]).

Also pertinent is the Deed's requirement that races be conducted between May 1 and November 1 if in the Northern Hemisphere and between November 1 and May 1 if in the Southern Hemisphere. Measuring 10 months from the Court of Appeals' April 7, [*2]2009 order, the first race would have to be conducted on February 8, 2010. Nevertheless, on April 23, 2009, SNG informed GGYC that the first race was to conducted on May 3, 2010, and that SNG would notify GGYC before December 3, 2009 of a Northern Hemisphere venue. GGYC moved to hold SNG in contempt, arguing that, by virtue of the April 7, 2009 order, the first race had to be conducted on February 8, 2010, and that SNG had to notify GGYC of the location of the races no later than August 8, 2009. SNG responded that it set the date in May, rather than February, because GGYC's Notice of Challenge expressly put forth a Northern Hemisphere challenge and, under the Deed, a Northern Hemisphere race could not take place earlier than May. On May 14, 2009, the court directed SNG to hold the races in February 2010, "as per the order of the Court of Appeals."

On August 5, 2009, SNG announced the selection of RAK, which is in the Northern Hemisphere, as the venue of the races. GGYC again objected, arguing that, by virtue of the April 7, 2009 order, and notwithstanding the Deed's requirement that a February race be conducted in the Southern Hemisphere, the races had to be conducted in Valencia, Spain, which is in the Northern Hemisphere, in February 2010, absent agreement otherwise between the parties or SNG's selection of an alternative Deed-compliant location by August 8, 2009. The motion court correctly rejected SNG's selection of RAK. The April 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals does not explicitly state that it intended to remove entirely the Deed's hemisphere requirements, or otherwise indicate, as SNG argues, that it was a compromise between GGYC's claimed right to have the race conducted as soon as 10 months after issuance of the order and SNG's claimed right to select a Northern Hemisphere venue. Accordingly, the order should be read as carving out an exception to the Deed's hemisphere requirements in the case of Valencia, and the phrase "or any other location selected by SNG" should be read as "or any other Deed-compliant location selected by SNG." RAK, which is in the Northern Hemisphere, is not a Deed-compliant location for a February race.

Concerning the November 4, 2009 order on appeal, the court correctly found, based on extrinsic evidence, that the Deed excludes rudders for the purpose of measuring the length on load water-line. The Deed, which provides, in relevant part, that the competing vessels, "if single-masted, must measure between 44 and 90 feet on the load water-line," and states that neither the "center-board" nor "sliding keel" shall be considered part of the vessel for any purposes of measurement, but does not define "load water-line," which is clearly a term of art with specialized meaning in the sport of sailing, is ambiguous as to whether rudders should be considered in measuring the length on load water-line. The mere fact that the Deed expressly only states that the center-board and sliding keel shall not be considered in the measurement does not necessarily mean that all other parts of the vessel, including the rudders, were intended to be considered in making that measurement. Given this ambiguity, the court properly relied on undisputed extrinsic evidence, including New York Yacht Club rules extant at the time the 1887 Deed was settled, showing that length on load water-line is typically measured "exclusive of any portion of the rudder or rudder-stock." [*3]

We have considered the remaining contentions and find them unavailing.




Labels: , ,


At 8:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Once again SNG is busted in the NYSC for cheatin off the water to gain an advantage on the water.

Once again so much BS from SNG about their mantra about winning it on the water!!!

Shame on SNG as a Trustee & bring on the BoFD.

At 9:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A wing will break in the waves and the horrible icy wind of Valencia next february, let's have fun .... the nice weather of San D. and RAK is over.

At 9:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

American power as usual. Obviously now TE will not contest anymore that the rules are unfair, BOR choose the venue, set the rules and so on. After SUN Micros. another nice shopping for LE : the AC.

At 9:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:18 - and EB didn't go shopping in NZ for the 31st. What 1 or 2 Swiss sailors on the boating doing what?

At 12:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOL @ 9:33pm. I suggest you sort out your problems closer to home before throwing stones. I have struggled to find any yank sailors on board BOR in proper sailing positions. A couple of yanks in the afterguard, but that is it. Pretty good for an "American" team. I think you will find this is a pretty weak way of criticising the opposition!

At 2:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks Justice Kornreich you're
a great Patriot!

American Justice for American People!
Wow, Justice Kornreich and Larry Ellison are the WINNERS of the Cup.

At 3:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All this whining from Alinghilites is so girlish and embarassing. Take it like a man and stop whining!!!

At 6:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another NYSC order against SNG/Alinghi/EB and another thread of whining Alinghi supporters who like their team just don't want to understand the rule of law that governs the AC Trust & Deed.

The whole world fully expects SNG/Alinghi/EB to try more funny stuff as that is the only way they can play the game and try to win off the water.


Post a Comment

<< Home